Every now and there there is some GREAT news on the environment!
We just learned that Bat Conservation International has helped save the largest Bat colony in the world. Largest Bat Colony Saved! The Executive Director is a friend of ours. If you love bats, maybe you want to join Bat Conservation International.
HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
Boo!
An alliance of engaged residents working for the benefit of rural, urban, and natural communities in the Escondido Area.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Escondido Mayor Abed failed to comply with water quality regulations--Implications for Escondido
Issues around water quality
and regulation continue to worsen here in Escondido. Please review
this important information regarding Escondido Mayor Sam Abed's violation of
the stormwater permits Escondido 2014.
This is serious and is very troubling for the region. Please watch the video clip
at the end which includes the comments of Mayor Abed and then
Deputy Mayor Marie Waldron (now in the Assembly) about their views on the
stormwater permit and regulation. This a key reason we have lost
confidence in the city’s ability to achieve compliance with stormwater regulations. We thank the Regional Board for their diligent action
in investigating this issue
This
information has major ramifications on the water quality goals of Escondido
Neighbors United.
1.
We learned late last week that the Oak Creek developers have
changed their project to locate even more homes on to sensitive lands next to
Felicita Creek. We have raised repeated concerns about how
stormwater is planned for that project. More homes closer to the creek
means more hardening and more runoff potential. Now, those impacts will
be even worse. In our comments on the DEIR, we raised several
concerns about the future enforcement of standards. The environmental review
of that project stated repeatedly that impacts would not occur from the
project because there would be compliance with the stormwater regulations.
We are not so sure.
2. Now
we learn that Mayor Sam Abed, the leader of the city, has failed to comply
with stormwater quality laws and is currently subject to an on-going
investigation by the Water Quality Control Board regarding his paving
is property at 540 W. Grand Ave. This evidence of his lack of commitment
to our important water quality and environmental laws should be of concern to
everyone in our region. The Mayor's disregard of regulations
has financial impacts as well-- creating unfair competition and costs all of
us, the city, the state, additional money to bring him into
compliance.
3.
The source of the violations is clear in Mayor Abed's comments about his
lack of respect and commitment to stormwater regulations when he offered his
opinions in January, 2011 in excerpt--: For me, I’ve seen this several
times. It’s another mandate…the EPA has a history of over regulation....there is no question of the over-regulation in this..." …the most cost effective way is mother nature, that will take
care of it without regulation without paperwork…” (emphasis added)
There are
many troubling aspects to these statements. Since Mayor Abed is in a position
of leadership, he has a responsibility to learn how the environment actually
works. The reason Mother Nature can’t ‘take care of it’ herself
is that we are constantly paving it over—hardening the surface with parking lots and development causing pollution and runoff to flow off the
sites which in turn erodes our creeks and degrades our water quality.
Because of this, we all pay the price of polluted water, stream
erosion, and flooding. If the EPA had been over-regulating, we
would have clean water now! The reason the stormwater permit continues to
get more stringent is that we are under-regulating and, in this case, under-complying.
This has
only heightened our significant concerns about the runoff issues in Escondido.
As it, now stands we cannot rely on the city to secure and
ensure compliance with the stormwater rules for new development. There
are many such developments proposed for Escondido, such as at Oak Creek, Amanda
Estates, Safari Highlands Ranch, and others that will need very strong
implementation of stormwater requirements or our environment and water quality
will suffer.
Mayor
Abed does not seem to understand the critical role the stormwater pollution
permit has in cleaning up our local waters. That he, himself, does
not comply is a significant problem and sends a troubling message about his
commitment to environmental protection rules.
We urge
the Mayor to take the time to get educated on water quality and environmental
issues-- and comply with them-- so
that we can all have more confidence in the actions of the city he leads as we
face more and more development threats to our water quality in the region.
As for
the regulators, we actually agree with Ms. Waldron who speaks at the end of the video clip, the Water Board is government
at its finest, we appreciate the Water Board's firm hand and diligence in
upholding and defending our water quality regulations. We urge the Water
Board to continue to ensure compliance at this site. We will have
additional recommendations soon about future actions the Board should take to
ensure full-compliance in Escondido.
More
later.
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Channel 10 update story on contamination in Felicita Creek
Yesterday, Channel 10 ran a story on the posting of the Notice to Park Users in Felicita Park.
Channel 10 on signs in Felicita Creek We would like to thank Channel 10 for continuing to cover this story and in helping achieve this result. Escondido Neighbors United will continue our work to ensure that the public is aware of the issue. More importantly, we will continue our work to secure cleanup of the creek as our top priority.
We want to ensure that every kid who wants to play in the creek can do so.
It is the promise of the Clean Water Act.
It is our commitment too.
Channel 10 on signs in Felicita Creek We would like to thank Channel 10 for continuing to cover this story and in helping achieve this result. Escondido Neighbors United will continue our work to ensure that the public is aware of the issue. More importantly, we will continue our work to secure cleanup of the creek as our top priority.
We want to ensure that every kid who wants to play in the creek can do so.
It is the promise of the Clean Water Act.
It is our commitment too.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Felicita Park NOTICE TO PARK VISITORS released by DTSC- ENU recommendations
In response to Escondido Neighbors United and community requests, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) released a Notice to Park Visitor on their website regarding the contamination in Felicita Creek.
See notice here: NOTICE TO FELICITA PARK VISITORS
We are happy to see that a notice has finally been offered and we will be looking to the County to ensure that it is posted where the visiting public can see it. This Notice is a commitment the DTSC made to the public at the September 30, 3014 public meeting and we appreciate their following through on this.
While we are glad the information in some form is being provided to the general public, there are a couple points that the reader should keep in mind-- especially regarding potential risks.
Our understanding is that where 1) a contaminant that impacts health is present and 2) a pathway of exposure exists—then a risk of impact exists. It may not be a high or even a medium risk but how an individual reacts to exposure to a chemical is a large unknown and cannot be fully predicted. The creek is only measured every 4-6 months so the levels could go up and down during that time. There are also more than one contaminant in the creek and people of all ages, pregnant women, children may be exposed to the creek. There are many uncertainties related to risk and exposure. Even the DTSC Human Health Risk Memo discusses conditions of use under which there may be potential risks. However, the Memo fails to acknowledge that the pools near FC-7 (the most southern monitoring location) are not the only pools that children play in. The area near the northern playground, and the highest monitoring results, also has pools and water year round. Felicita Park is not only a Park that people occasionally visit, but it is the 'backyard' to lots of homes and families and there are people who use it every day.
Further, it is important to know that MCL is not the "safe" level. But, rather there is a significant cost-benefit analysis used to set the MCL based on risk and cost.
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Documents/MCLreview/MCLreviewprocedure.pdf
It is somewhat confusing that DTSC makes hard and absolute statements about some aspects of the site even where uncertainties exist and equivocates on others.
The Notice states that contamination in the creek is ‘likely caused’ by the Chatham Barrel Yard. If based on all of the accumulated data and knowledge of the site history, hydrogeology, and cleanup actions, DTSC is unable to state the source of the contamination is from the former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard, it is unclear why are the agency seems more certain of the risk where far less evidence exists to make the claim. We would suggest that it would be in the public's best interest if DTSC would be consistent with its disclosure of uncertainties.
We suggest that DTSC revise the Notice to State that normal exposure is anticipated to pose a very low risk or even a very, very low risk instead of stating-- what cannot be proved-- “no” risk.
See notice here: NOTICE TO FELICITA PARK VISITORS
We are happy to see that a notice has finally been offered and we will be looking to the County to ensure that it is posted where the visiting public can see it. This Notice is a commitment the DTSC made to the public at the September 30, 3014 public meeting and we appreciate their following through on this.
While we are glad the information in some form is being provided to the general public, there are a couple points that the reader should keep in mind-- especially regarding potential risks.
ENU Requests revision of language in Notice regarding risks from the contamination
As the Notice states, the evidence shows that the level of volatile organic compounds, (VOCs) in the creek exceed the cleanup levels of the Maximum Contaminant Levels or MCLs. These are the agreed upon cleanup levels for the Chatham pollution. The Notice goes on to state that there are no risks and it will not cause any health concerns. To say, so uncategorically, that there are no risks, in our view, overstates the situation. It is surprising, given the uncertainties and unknowns of the exposures, individual differences, chemical concentrations, modeling, changes in cancer slopes etc... that DTSC affirmatively states that there is no risk. Our understanding is that where 1) a contaminant that impacts health is present and 2) a pathway of exposure exists—then a risk of impact exists. It may not be a high or even a medium risk but how an individual reacts to exposure to a chemical is a large unknown and cannot be fully predicted. The creek is only measured every 4-6 months so the levels could go up and down during that time. There are also more than one contaminant in the creek and people of all ages, pregnant women, children may be exposed to the creek. There are many uncertainties related to risk and exposure. Even the DTSC Human Health Risk Memo discusses conditions of use under which there may be potential risks. However, the Memo fails to acknowledge that the pools near FC-7 (the most southern monitoring location) are not the only pools that children play in. The area near the northern playground, and the highest monitoring results, also has pools and water year round. Felicita Park is not only a Park that people occasionally visit, but it is the 'backyard' to lots of homes and families and there are people who use it every day.
Further, it is important to know that MCL is not the "safe" level. But, rather there is a significant cost-benefit analysis used to set the MCL based on risk and cost.
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Documents/MCLreview/MCLreviewprocedure.pdf
It is somewhat confusing that DTSC makes hard and absolute statements about some aspects of the site even where uncertainties exist and equivocates on others.
The Notice states that contamination in the creek is ‘likely caused’ by the Chatham Barrel Yard. If based on all of the accumulated data and knowledge of the site history, hydrogeology, and cleanup actions, DTSC is unable to state the source of the contamination is from the former Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard, it is unclear why are the agency seems more certain of the risk where far less evidence exists to make the claim. We would suggest that it would be in the public's best interest if DTSC would be consistent with its disclosure of uncertainties.
We suggest that DTSC revise the Notice to State that normal exposure is anticipated to pose a very low risk or even a very, very low risk instead of stating-- what cannot be proved-- “no” risk.
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Escondido Alliance/ Alianza Escondido NEW EDITION Features election and Felicita Creek
Our monthly Escondido local newspaper has released its Election Edition. Please take a look. You'll also find an article on our own Felicita Creek-- A Creek Worthy of our Affection--and Protection! Check it out!
Escondido Alliance Latest Edition
Monday, October 20, 2014
Just in Time for Halloween-- NATIONAL FOOD DAY-- October 24th
Something just for fun...and for health. You might be interested in National Food Day which is celebrated around the country on October 24th. Learn more here. National Food Day Website. Food Day has an amazing collection of political and organizational support and a clear platform of action. You can find a Food Day event near you on the website. There will be one at the World Beat Center in Balboa Park as well. We have a super-delicious Carrot Soup recipe we'll share later.Here is what they are working on
Food Day Priorities
Food Day's national priorities address overarching concerns within the food system and provide common ground for building the food movement. Food Day aims to:
- Promote safer, healthier diets: The foods we eat should promote, not undermine, our good health. Yet, every year we spend more than $150 billion on obesity-related health care costs, plus another $73 billion in reduced productivity.
- Support sustainable and organic farms: Currently, sustainable farms receive little to no federal support and often lack market access to keep them competitive. Meanwhile, the largest 10 percent of industrialized farms—which contribute to poor health and severe environmental degradation—receive 75 percent of all farm subsidies.
- Reduce hunger and improve food access: Currently, around 50 million Americans are considered "food insecure", or near hunger, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps) participation is at an all-time high. SNAP is vital to reducing hunger, but the program’s budget is under constant attack while federal measures to increase food access are minimal.
- Reform factory farms to protect the environment and farm animals: Today, most farm animals are confined in “factory farms”—sometimes containing as many as 50,000-100,000 cattle, hens, or pigs. These practices result in needless animal abuse and illness, environmental degradation, and harm the people who live in and around those facilities.
- Support fair working conditions for food and farm workers: 20 million workers throughout the U.S. food system harvest, process, ship, sell, cook, and serve the food we eat every day. And yet, many farmworkers earn well below poverty levels while the tipped minimum wage for restaurant servers has remained at $2.13 per hour for the last 21 years.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Vote NO on PROP G-Escondido Charter proposal on November 4th
Escondido Neighbors United urges Escondido voters to VOTE NO ON PROP G- The Escondido Charter City proposition. Not all Charters are all bad, but this proposal is not in the interest of the people of Escondido. Here is a good analysis by Charter Watch Escondido Charter Watch which outlines the many arguments against Prop G.
Please remember to Vote by November 4th and Vote NO on Prop G.
Please remember to Vote by November 4th and Vote NO on Prop G.
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Deputy Mayor Olga Diaz Supports Community Goals of Civic Engagement and Environmental Safety
We have important news! Olga Diaz, a candidate for Mayor of Escondido, has stated her support for important community goals. In a time when it is common to feel like elected officials don't listen to the community- we are lucky in Escondido to have a representative like Deputy Mayor Olga Diaz. When we first approached her, she was willing to meet, discuss, ask questions. She took the time to listen to local folks, learned about the issues, and is supporting Escondido Neighbors United Goals for our Felicita area. Please see this flyer. Olga Diaz Support Community Goals
We are so lucky to have her in office! We will be even more lucky when she is elected MAYOR OF ESCONDIDO. Please support candidates like Olga Diaz who support the community. You can learn more about her at www.olgadiaz.com. If you have your absentee ballot--please fill it out and VOTE. If you don't vote absentee, please remember to VOTE NOVEMBER 4th.
Elections matter.
We are so lucky to have her in office! We will be even more lucky when she is elected MAYOR OF ESCONDIDO. Please support candidates like Olga Diaz who support the community. You can learn more about her at www.olgadiaz.com. If you have your absentee ballot--please fill it out and VOTE. If you don't vote absentee, please remember to VOTE NOVEMBER 4th.
Elections matter.
Thursday, October 2, 2014
Escondido Neighbors Follow up Letter to DTSC
Here is our letter following up to DTSC.ENU to DTSC Oct 2 We will keep you posted.
Have a great weekend!
Have a great weekend!
Letter from Supervisor Dave Roberts
Here is a letter on the Chatham site from Supervisor Dave Roberts who is providing thoughtful leadership on the important issue. Letter from Supervisor Dave Roberts dated Sept. 29th, 2014. This is a complex site and there is room for many perspectives. Supervisor Roberts is skillfully leading the dialog on this situation and we are very grateful.
Watch this Fox5 Story on Chatham
We're catching up after a busy, busy time...here is another great story on the Chatham issue--this one my Fox Channel 5. See here Fox5 Story on Chatham
Check it out! Thanks Channel 5!
Check it out! Thanks Channel 5!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)